<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fasttelco security issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/</link>
	<description>A blog by Mark and Nat, a married couple who are living in Kuwait. Mark works in Advertising while Nat works in TV.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:53:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hashas</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-452722</link>
		<dc:creator>Hashas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-452722</guid>
		<description>Hai IT Guys,

The Implementing of WiMAX Basestation and Antenna in Some Areas of Kuwait is Still Under Testing by Arabtelecom(Mada Communication).

There will be No use to the Users of ARABTELECOM(MADA COMMUNICATION) 

If You ask their Helpdesk Center 1822888 (or) Office 1801888 they con&#039;t answer. They don&#039;t have the answer even the Intellgent Engineers of Arabtelecom.

The customer&#039;s will face the Problems as the same like before.

Because they are still in some Dought&#039;s about the Implementations &amp; Oprerations of WiMAX Basestations. 

They cannot solve your Problems immediately. 

The customer&#039;s Will face the same Problems creating by Arabtelecom Current Wireless Broad Band Basestations and Antenna&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hai IT Guys,</p>
<p>The Implementing of WiMAX Basestation and Antenna in Some Areas of Kuwait is Still Under Testing by Arabtelecom(Mada Communication).</p>
<p>There will be No use to the Users of ARABTELECOM(MADA COMMUNICATION) </p>
<p>If You ask their Helpdesk Center 1822888 (or) Office 1801888 they con&#8217;t answer. They don&#8217;t have the answer even the Intellgent Engineers of Arabtelecom.</p>
<p>The customer&#8217;s will face the Problems as the same like before.</p>
<p>Because they are still in some Dought&#8217;s about the Implementations &amp; Oprerations of WiMAX Basestations. </p>
<p>They cannot solve your Problems immediately. </p>
<p>The customer&#8217;s Will face the same Problems creating by Arabtelecom Current Wireless Broad Band Basestations and Antenna&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark sutton</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-428449</link>
		<dc:creator>mark sutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-428449</guid>
		<description>Hi all  - I&#039;ve been following this story for itp.net IT news -

I&#039;ve got a statement on the problem from Google, (no luck with FASTtelco though), although Google claim that users couldn&#039;t access other people&#039;s accounts, just a summary page - wondered what people thought of that?

more here: http://www.itp.net/news/512232

be interested to know if the problems with other sites are still ongoing as well

rgds,

MS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all  &#8211; I&#8217;ve been following this story for itp.net IT news -</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a statement on the problem from Google, (no luck with FASTtelco though), although Google claim that users couldn&#8217;t access other people&#8217;s accounts, just a summary page &#8211; wondered what people thought of that?</p>
<p>more here: <a href="http://www.itp.net/news/512232" rel="nofollow">http://www.itp.net/news/512232</a></p>
<p>be interested to know if the problems with other sites are still ongoing as well</p>
<p>rgds,</p>
<p>MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426908</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426908</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Rayboy&lt;/b&gt;,
Different frequency = WiMAX.
What ArabTelecom uses is the standard 2.4GHz frequency.

Both use point-to-point antennas; that doesn&#039;t make it the same technology.

And yes, they did implement the actual WiMAX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Rayboy</b>,<br />
Different frequency = WiMAX.<br />
What ArabTelecom uses is the standard 2.4GHz frequency.</p>
<p>Both use point-to-point antennas; that doesn&#8217;t make it the same technology.</p>
<p>And yes, they did implement the actual WiMAX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayboy</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426877</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426877</guid>
		<description>FT ? and WIMAX? .. just becoz they use the term WIMAX? that doesnt mean they are  using the real WIMAX technology. They still following the same concept like arabtelecom, except on a different frequency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FT ? and WIMAX? .. just becoz they use the term WIMAX? that doesnt mean they are  using the real WIMAX technology. They still following the same concept like arabtelecom, except on a different frequency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MX5</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426864</link>
		<dc:creator>MX5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426864</guid>
		<description>I would imagine that thier Wimax Base Station Unit (BSU) would be connected to one of the POPs or even any of the exchanges, depending on which area in Kuwait that they are covering. This way the BSU would have direct connectivity to their core devices via Fiber cables.

anyway just speculating, thanks for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would imagine that thier Wimax Base Station Unit (BSU) would be connected to one of the POPs or even any of the exchanges, depending on which area in Kuwait that they are covering. This way the BSU would have direct connectivity to their core devices via Fiber cables.</p>
<p>anyway just speculating, thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426860</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426860</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;MX5&lt;/b&gt;,
As far as I know, all ISPs rent a space from the MOC and put their equipment there. This however does not apply to FT&#039;s WiMAX, as they only rent the fiber cables from the MOC, and keep the equipment at their own locations.

This information was given by QualityNet &amp; FT project managers.

Maybe they fixed the problem by now... maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>MX5</b>,<br />
As far as I know, all ISPs rent a space from the MOC and put their equipment there. This however does not apply to FT&#8217;s WiMAX, as they only rent the fiber cables from the MOC, and keep the equipment at their own locations.</p>
<p>This information was given by QualityNet &amp; FT project managers.</p>
<p>Maybe they fixed the problem by now&#8230; maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MX5</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426845</link>
		<dc:creator>MX5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426845</guid>
		<description>MBH,
FT is renting space at each MOC exhange and at each HUB/POP, SKB, MSF and TEC, each exchange is connected to its repected POP, for example Hawally is connected to TEC, Ahmadi is connected to MSF and so on, and i think its the same for every ISP or how else  would they have connectivity to their dslams and other equipment in each exchange, I would think that The Wimax backbone is only used for the wimax connections because Fiber cables are way more dependable than any wireless solution. As for the problem with the cache, I have an FT and I have tried logging into gmail and amazon and had no problems, I dont have an KFH or BBK account so I cant confirm if there are any issues or not.

Soul, just wondering are you refering to Burgan Bank or Boubyan Bank?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MBH,<br />
FT is renting space at each MOC exhange and at each HUB/POP, SKB, MSF and TEC, each exchange is connected to its repected POP, for example Hawally is connected to TEC, Ahmadi is connected to MSF and so on, and i think its the same for every ISP or how else  would they have connectivity to their dslams and other equipment in each exchange, I would think that The Wimax backbone is only used for the wimax connections because Fiber cables are way more dependable than any wireless solution. As for the problem with the cache, I have an FT and I have tried logging into gmail and amazon and had no problems, I dont have an KFH or BBK account so I cant confirm if there are any issues or not.</p>
<p>Soul, just wondering are you refering to Burgan Bank or Boubyan Bank?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426775</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426775</guid>
		<description>I emailed Arab Times newspaper and pointed at the issue. MAYBE that will force FT to fix the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I emailed Arab Times newspaper and pointed at the issue. MAYBE that will force FT to fix the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426770</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426770</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;K.theKuwaiti&lt;/b&gt;,
The thing about Arab Telecom &amp; fiber-based links, is that they&#039;re all using the MOC&#039;s infrastructure and whatever happens to your links at the MOC end, you become under its mercy.

Let&#039;s say that Shuwaikh hub (SKB) had some temporal damage, or an electricity outage (and I feel we&#039;ll have a lot of that fun during summer), all our links will be dead, because the equipment is on the MOC&#039;s grounds.

So far, the only company that doesn&#039;t use the MOC&#039;s end is FT, with its WiMAX infrastructure. FT is rented fiber pairs only to connect between different locations, they don&#039;t rent space to house the equipment at the MOC.

I heard rumors that QualityNet is trying to get license for WiMAX, but I donno whether they&#039;ll be using MOC or have their own thing.

&lt;b&gt;Soul&lt;/b&gt;,
Assuming your sources are legitimate, so for a whole day, every FT subscriber can enjoy the exotic experience of venturing into other people&#039;s accounts, and if not exotic enough, even expose their own!!!
I&#039;m getting such an urge to get an FT account and loot all that money sitting there...

By the way, this begs the question: BBK &amp; KFH don&#039;t use SSL in all their pages????!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>K.theKuwaiti</b>,<br />
The thing about Arab Telecom &amp; fiber-based links, is that they&#8217;re all using the MOC&#8217;s infrastructure and whatever happens to your links at the MOC end, you become under its mercy.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say that Shuwaikh hub (SKB) had some temporal damage, or an electricity outage (and I feel we&#8217;ll have a lot of that fun during summer), all our links will be dead, because the equipment is on the MOC&#8217;s grounds.</p>
<p>So far, the only company that doesn&#8217;t use the MOC&#8217;s end is FT, with its WiMAX infrastructure. FT is rented fiber pairs only to connect between different locations, they don&#8217;t rent space to house the equipment at the MOC.</p>
<p>I heard rumors that QualityNet is trying to get license for WiMAX, but I donno whether they&#8217;ll be using MOC or have their own thing.</p>
<p><b>Soul</b>,<br />
Assuming your sources are legitimate, so for a whole day, every FT subscriber can enjoy the exotic experience of venturing into other people&#8217;s accounts, and if not exotic enough, even expose their own!!!<br />
I&#8217;m getting such an urge to get an FT account and loot all that money sitting there&#8230;</p>
<p>By the way, this begs the question: BBK &amp; KFH don&#8217;t use SSL in all their pages????!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soon</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426723</link>
		<dc:creator>Soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426723</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Keep on posting about FT and soon u won&#039;t have a blog to login to ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Keep on posting about FT and soon u won&#8217;t have a blog to login to ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tan Go</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tan Go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426718</guid>
		<description>All the above is very educational!!!
Thank you all / Tahiyyati</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the above is very educational!!!<br />
Thank you all / Tahiyyati</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purgatory</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426714</link>
		<dc:creator>Purgatory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426714</guid>
		<description>I cannót get to it with all this DNS and Cache Mumbo Jumbo going around, but thanks for the offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannót get to it with all this DNS and Cache Mumbo Jumbo going around, but thanks for the offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soul</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426708</link>
		<dc:creator>Soul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426708</guid>
		<description>Purgatory, 

You got your bone now. Bite my arse !

~ Soul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purgatory, </p>
<p>You got your bone now. Bite my arse !</p>
<p>~ Soul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soul</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426707</link>
		<dc:creator>Soul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426707</guid>
		<description>K, I guess its G.W.Bush. 
This is my best personal guess after seeing all those videos which popped up.

No idea about Bin Laden.

However, sarcasm doesn&#039;t serve a purpose here.
I am honestly trying.

~ Soul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K, I guess its G.W.Bush.<br />
This is my best personal guess after seeing all those videos which popped up.</p>
<p>No idea about Bin Laden.</p>
<p>However, sarcasm doesn&#8217;t serve a purpose here.<br />
I am honestly trying.</p>
<p>~ Soul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purgatory</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426689</link>
		<dc:creator>Purgatory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/kthekuwaiti/kuwait/fasttelco-security-issues/#comment-426689</guid>
		<description>I never knew net companies had &quot;authorities&quot; .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never knew net companies had &#8220;authorities&#8221; .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
