iPhone over iPod Touch
Last week I posted an iPhone versus iPod Touch post and argued the fact that the iPhone is a better deal. Well looks like a lot more people share the same opinion, here is a snippet from iLounge’s review of the iPod Touch:
In addition to the previously mentioned missing pack-ins, you also lose iPhone’s camera, phone functionality, built-in speakers, built-in microphone, side volume controls, superior screen, superior battery, larger suite of applications, and Bluetooth wireless feature.
Here is a link for the full review. [Link]
Print
Email
Sep 17, 2007
Related Entries
iPhone Vs. iPod Touch
iPhone and iPod Touch wallpapers
My Quick iPhone Review
New iPod Nano’s and Touch on Amazon
Order the new iPods from Amazon
14 Comments, add your own...
1. SWOS | September 17th, 2007 at 9:43 pm
i think the 8GB iPhone is even better for music than the 8GB touch , since u can use the speakers to listen to music (its not that loud but more than enough for a small phone) it will keep u entertained in the office or before u go to bed. Not only that but u can control the volume from the side without touching the screen,in addition the battery of the iPhone does last longer like most people say.
so the iPhone is like 2 in 1 a phone and an iPod (plus ten million other things) so instead of carrying around a bulky mobile and a bulky MP3 with all those cables n crap, just get one device that does both things, and better.
2. Sarah 7 | September 17th, 2007 at 11:34 pm
Well, iPhone has a phone, sooooo….. :s
3. Marzouq | September 18th, 2007 at 12:51 am
Very interesting!
4. Wer3Y | September 18th, 2007 at 5:34 am
iPhone indeed!
5. i-RAQ | September 18th, 2007 at 7:37 am
well, i agree with all what you said,but looking at it in a different angle, what if people can not afford the iPhone, or they have a phone and not willing to buy another one, they would buy the iPod touch, and they still can have similar functions, people are different standards of livings,
p.s : cant wait to get my iPhone :>~
6. Mark | September 18th, 2007 at 9:12 am
I-RAQ iphone and ipod touch are same price.
7. K.TheKuwaiti | September 18th, 2007 at 9:33 am
I ordered a touch for the following reasons:
1. Its smaller
2. It has more space
3. It can be sold anywhere (don’t have to worry about a new firmware locking it).
4. Don’t need/want the extra features.
I am going to be using the iPod touch in my car and when I travel (play music/video) and has a browser to boot.. While it might not have all the features of the iPhone; it is a welcome evolution from the iPod Classic.
8. Armani Exchanger | September 18th, 2007 at 10:01 am
all what i wished for is to have a phone feature in a Nano iPod size…. but unfortunately :(
9. holla | September 18th, 2007 at 10:36 am
i’m gonna order an ipod touch and tell everyone it’s an iphone, no one will notice!!!
10. Steve_leb | September 18th, 2007 at 11:14 pm
holla.. lol… thats a good one.. even steve jobs wont tell the difference from distance..
11. i-RAQ | September 19th, 2007 at 5:39 am
Holla, you would tell the difference though…hehe…
12. SWOS | September 19th, 2007 at 6:47 pm
i-RAQ both are the same/similar price , the iPhone (8GB) is sold for 400$ and the iPod touch is sold for 300$ so its only 28KD more expensive than an iPod touch but its worth it, well everyone has a different view of things, just search online well and get the one that u’ll use more.
13. Mark | September 19th, 2007 at 6:50 pm
There is iphone for 300$ also.
14. SWOS | September 19th, 2007 at 7:54 pm
yup the 4GB one. its 299$ btw :P
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
Commenting Rules: Any comments that are personal attacks towards other users will be deleted. You are also not allowed to post with the name Mark or Nat since that might cause confusion. Finally, no advertising is allowed, you can't advertise your products or websites here unless its beneficial to the topic thats being discussed. One more thing: We are not responsible for readers comments!