<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freelensing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/</link>
	<description>Mark and Nat, a married couple who are living in Kuwait. Both are designers, Mark works in advertising while Nat runs her own design studio called Push+Pull.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhi</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-505561</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 22:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-505561</guid>
		<description>2:54AM 48 Seconds. Thats when i read about freelensing and unable to wait myself tried . Its frigging Amazing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2:54AM 48 Seconds. Thats when i read about freelensing and unable to wait myself tried . Its frigging Amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-489333</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-489333</guid>
		<description>bak: i agree, thats what I was trying to explain above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bak: i agree, thats what I was trying to explain above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /p/edant</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-489331</link>
		<dc:creator>/p/edant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-489331</guid>
		<description>the term aperture relates to the size of the size of the circle created by the lenses aperture blades in relation to the focal length, freelensing normally with the lens will not change the focal length, and will not change the f number. the extra bokeh is caused by the focal plane shifting, or more precisely, by using selective focus which is actually a different effect. the widest aperture a lens can have is not like f1, its like f0.7 

&quot;Stanley Kubrick&#039;s film Barry Lyndon has scenes with the largest relative aperture in film history: f/0.7.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the term aperture relates to the size of the size of the circle created by the lenses aperture blades in relation to the focal length, freelensing normally with the lens will not change the focal length, and will not change the f number. the extra bokeh is caused by the focal plane shifting, or more precisely, by using selective focus which is actually a different effect. the widest aperture a lens can have is not like f1, its like f0.7 </p>
<p>&#8220;Stanley Kubrick&#8217;s film Barry Lyndon has scenes with the largest relative aperture in film history: f/0.7.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bak</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-487381</link>
		<dc:creator>bak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-487381</guid>
		<description>who say&#039;s that it&#039;s f0?it indicates f0 on the camera coz it&#039;s not sensing any lens attached.
the aperture is still the widest you own lens can give you, like 1.4, for example</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who say&#8217;s that it&#8217;s f0?it indicates f0 on the camera coz it&#8217;s not sensing any lens attached.<br />
the aperture is still the widest you own lens can give you, like 1.4, for example</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flowers</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-470458</link>
		<dc:creator>Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-470458</guid>
		<description>[...] took these today with my Nikon D90 and 50mm 1.8/f lens. I was freelensing with the lens held the wrong way round to get the macro ability. No retouching, just some minor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] took these today with my Nikon D90 and 50mm 1.8/f lens. I was freelensing with the lens held the wrong way round to get the macro ability. No retouching, just some minor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: basma al sabah</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-459250</link>
		<dc:creator>basma al sabah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-459250</guid>
		<description>so you just buy the lens and focus on whatever you want!;p i ALWAYS wanted to do that!;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so you just buy the lens and focus on whatever you want!;p i ALWAYS wanted to do that!;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-459237</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-459237</guid>
		<description>fuck. I want to try this out so bad, but I only have my D70 and I really don&#039;t want dust getting into it... sucks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fuck. I want to try this out so bad, but I only have my D70 and I really don&#8217;t want dust getting into it&#8230; sucks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-459177</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-459177</guid>
		<description>The light leaks in freelensing occur because light is coming in from the small gap between the lens and the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The light leaks in freelensing occur because light is coming in from the small gap between the lens and the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGirlWithKaleidoscopeEyes</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-459175</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGirlWithKaleidoscopeEyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-459175</guid>
		<description>Enzain khalna min hatha, how come it produce a so called &quot;light leak&quot; effect when you&#039;re using a digital camera with a sensor w no film inside? Last time I checked light leak meant the over exposed areas from some unwanted light leaking through the cameras body and spoiling some parts of the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enzain khalna min hatha, how come it produce a so called &#8220;light leak&#8221; effect when you&#8217;re using a digital camera with a sensor w no film inside? Last time I checked light leak meant the over exposed areas from some unwanted light leaking through the cameras body and spoiling some parts of the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-459169</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-459169</guid>
		<description>I know, because there is no lens in front of the camera u get an aperture reading of 0 in the EXIF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, because there is no lens in front of the camera u get an aperture reading of 0 in the EXIF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGirlWithKaleidoscopeEyes</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-459168</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGirlWithKaleidoscopeEyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-459168</guid>
		<description>Or &lt;i&gt;maybe&lt;/i&gt; the only reason you got zero aperture is because the lens wasn&#039;t attached to the camera and that&#039;s why the Exif data reads f/0.0! 
See this photo&#039;s EXIF data for example http://www.flickr.com/photos/gentlepurespace/3331254779/meta/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or <i>maybe</i> the only reason you got zero aperture is because the lens wasn&#8217;t attached to the camera and that&#8217;s why the Exif data reads f/0.0!<br />
See this photo&#8217;s EXIF data for example <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gentlepurespace/3331254779/meta/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/gentlepurespace/3331254779/meta/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holla</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/interesting/freelensing/#comment-459153</link>
		<dc:creator>Holla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/?p=6591#comment-459153</guid>
		<description>freeeeeeeeeeeee baaaaaallin&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freeeeeeeeeeeee baaaaaallin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

