Related Entries

1. 1. holla | April 20th, 2006 at 5:22 pm

   yeah wtf i got a 74 too. i answered most of the shit neutral.

2. 2. lost | April 20th, 2006 at 5:45 pm

   i got 65 which is pretty evil too .Always thought i was eviiiil :)

3. 3. Vineeth Menon | April 20th, 2006 at 5:48 pm

   i got a 76… I was sorta at 2 & 4… except for a few 5’s….

4. 4. nibaq | April 20th, 2006 at 6:05 pm

   The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
   Your Machiavelli score is: 80
   You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli’s opinions.

   I worked tech support…

5. 5. Shot | April 20th, 2006 at 6:09 pm

   I got 74

6. 6. Upstairs Blogger | April 20th, 2006 at 6:42 pm

   I wouldn’t get too worked up with the test score if I were you - at some level defining evil is culture specific and temporal.
   So take a chill pill, mate!

7. 7. Milagro | April 20th, 2006 at 7:44 pm

   i got 50 .

8. 8. dsfds | April 20th, 2006 at 7:54 pm

   55 :$

9. 9. Aqib | April 20th, 2006 at 8:04 pm

   I got a 76.

10. 10. orange juice | April 20th, 2006 at 8:05 pm

    I scored 64 and am not evil

11. 11. zaina | April 20th, 2006 at 8:21 pm

    75

12. 12. Mark | April 20th, 2006 at 8:42 pm

    ok so the majority of people in Kuwait are evil.. interesting

13. 13. busynow | April 20th, 2006 at 9:08 pm

    The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
    Your Machiavelli score is: 81
    You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli’s opinions.

    Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there’s a significant minority at either extreme.

14. 14. mooodi | April 20th, 2006 at 9:59 pm

    “Your Machiavelli score is: 72
    You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli’s opinions.”

    I would say only 3/5 of those questions are directly related to being evil.

15. 15. Pieces of Me | April 20th, 2006 at 10:19 pm

    i got a 52

16. 16. Yasmine | April 20th, 2006 at 11:41 pm

    where did you get the word evil from? evil-ness isn’t what the test calculates

17. 17. holla | April 20th, 2006 at 11:44 pm

    i think the test is just fucked.

18. 18. Mo Hat | April 21st, 2006 at 12:46 am

    74, omg i’m so evil. Maybe it’s the true personality, the one we don’t want people to see, as everyone is wearing a mask

19. 19. Kuwaiti Mal Awal | April 21st, 2006 at 3:38 am

    Your Machiavelli score is: 82

    why !!

    this is not true

20. 20. Yazeed | April 21st, 2006 at 10:53 am

    Your Machiavelli score is: 81
    You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli’s opinions.

21. 21. onlyme | April 21st, 2006 at 12:55 pm

    59 !

22. 22. FUZZ | April 21st, 2006 at 1:20 pm

    Holy shit, i got an 86. I guess its tru what people say, I’m too fucking evil to be true 666:P

23. 23. Carlsb3rg | April 21st, 2006 at 2:42 pm

    61, who said this tests evilness?

24. 24. Mark | April 21st, 2006 at 4:37 pm

    Machiavelli was evil..

25. 25. Carlsb3rg | April 22nd, 2006 at 1:45 am

    I think the correct word is politician, but nowadays both words get mixed up :)

26. 26. ran | April 22nd, 2006 at 9:13 am

    The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
    Your Machiavelli score is: 85
    You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli’s opinions.
    Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there’s a significant minority at either extreme.

    Well, Machiavelli was never evil. He can be considered to be the father of all politicians. He is to politics what Shakespeare is to English Literature.

27. 27. Mark | April 22nd, 2006 at 5:23 pm

    Machiavelli believed its better to be feared then loved. I don’t think you can be feared by being nice.

28. 28. ran | April 23rd, 2006 at 9:38 am

    You cannot be feared by being nice. But not being nice necessarily doesnot mean being evil. I have to shout at my 2 & half year old not to put her finger near the electric socket. I am definitly not being nice to her but does that make me evil ?

29. 29. Mark | April 23rd, 2006 at 9:41 am

    Yeah but you wouldnt electrecute your whole family to teach your 2 and a half year old sister electricity is dangerous. But thats what Machiavelli would do. He is extreme.

30. 30. ran | April 23rd, 2006 at 9:50 am

    lol…clarification….she is not my 2 & half year old sister…..she is my 2 & half year old daughter

31. 31. Mark | April 23rd, 2006 at 9:53 am

    lol sorry

32. 32. ran | April 24th, 2006 at 11:14 am

    “Because how one ought to live is so far removed from how one lives that he who lets go of what is done for that which one ought to do sooner learns ruin than his own preservation: because a man who might want to make a show of goodness in all things necessarily comes to ruin among so many who are not good. Because of this it is necessary for a prince, wanting to maintain himself, to learn how to be able to be not good and to use this and not use it according to necessity.”

    This is not evil. This may be against our moral & ethical thoughts, but very practical & certainly not evil. Excerpts from ‘The Prince’, by Machiavelli.

33. 33. ME!!!! | April 30th, 2006 at 1:08 am

    ummm…i got 86…but i don’t think it’s such a big deal…so what if i’m evil??? that’s not necessarily s bad thing…is it??? lol

34. 34. asmaa | July 13th, 2006 at 3:44 pm

    The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
    Your Machiavelli score is: 57
    You are a low Mach, you reject Machiavelli’s opinions.
    Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there’s a significant minority at either extreme.
    good.

35. 35. Manon | September 11th, 2006 at 1:01 am

    my machiavelli score was 81… i am pure evil!

36. 36. Kelvin | December 31st, 2006 at 12:47 am

    90.

Name (required)

Mail (required)

Website

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Commenting Rules: Any comments that are personal attacks towards other users will be deleted. You are also not allowed to post with the name Mark or Nat since that might cause confusion. Finally, no advertising is allowed, you can't advertise your products or websites here unless its beneficial to the topic thats being discussed. One more thing: We are not responsible for readers comments!