<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agility used to be PWC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/</link>
	<description>A blog by Mark and Nat, a married couple who are living in Kuwait. Mark works in Advertising while Nat works in TV.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-239575</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-239575</guid>
		<description>PWC Logistics has been under investigatioin by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) for 3-4 years.  There are multiple investigations both civil and criminal.  The US DOJ would not be doing this for fun.  This is very serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PWC Logistics has been under investigatioin by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) for 3-4 years.  There are multiple investigations both civil and criminal.  The US DOJ would not be doing this for fun.  This is very serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z District &#187; Customs War!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-95829</link>
		<dc:creator>Z District &#187; Customs War!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-95829</guid>
		<description>[...] It took over two months for my items to be released! And there was nothing to hold it for. They make things so difficult and annoying. From what I head PWC or Agility has taken over customs, but I dont know what exactly they are doing. But they are causing problems and one of them seems to be this problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It took over two months for my items to be released! And there was nothing to hold it for. They make things so difficult and annoying. From what I head PWC or Agility has taken over customs, but I dont know what exactly they are doing. But they are causing problems and one of them seems to be this problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rejoy</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-95080</link>
		<dc:creator>Rejoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-95080</guid>
		<description>Did it serve them good? NO for the time being...
Everything comes at a price..
AGLTY share performance quick look: http://www.kse.com.kw/Market/StkProfile.aspx?stk=603
a:)Total Outstanding shares: 783,304,723
b:)Value per share before name change: 2100 fils
c:)Value per share after name change: 1380 fils
Now some simple maths

a x b Total value of PWC: KD 1644,939,918.000
a x c Total value of AGLTY: KD 1080,960,517.000

A huge loss of KD 563,979,400.000 in matter of days.

Now this is a simple layman's calculation, name change is not the only reason behind this bad show. I heard they lost contracts, they are sueing the ministry, and all.

To control the share value the management had to buy all the shares in market thus bringing back the value to 1550 fils per share.

Anyway, I liked the PWC name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did it serve them good? NO for the time being&#8230;<br />
Everything comes at a price..<br />
AGLTY share performance quick look: <a href="http://www.kse.com.kw/Market/StkProfile.aspx?stk=603" rel="nofollow">http://www.kse.com.kw/Market/StkProfile.aspx?stk=603</a><br />
a:)Total Outstanding shares: 783,304,723<br />
b:)Value per share before name change: 2100 fils<br />
c:)Value per share after name change: 1380 fils<br />
Now some simple maths</p>
<p>a x b Total value of PWC: KD 1644,939,918.000<br />
a x c Total value of AGLTY: KD 1080,960,517.000</p>
<p>A huge loss of KD 563,979,400.000 in matter of days.</p>
<p>Now this is a simple layman&#8217;s calculation, name change is not the only reason behind this bad show. I heard they lost contracts, they are sueing the ministry, and all.</p>
<p>To control the share value the management had to buy all the shares in market thus bringing back the value to 1550 fils per share.</p>
<p>Anyway, I liked the PWC name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moocherx</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94739</link>
		<dc:creator>moocherx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94739</guid>
		<description>"a new logistics leader" i meant to say... I was being bothered by my microwave dinging in the background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a new logistics leader&#8221; i meant to say&#8230; I was being bothered by my microwave dinging in the background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moocherx</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94736</link>
		<dc:creator>moocherx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94736</guid>
		<description>Good logo - worth the money.  But I hope "a new leader in logistics" is just a tagline, not the branding... because a) you can't always be new... and b) they're not new anyway - they're a rebranded PWC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good logo - worth the money.  But I hope &#8220;a new leader in logistics&#8221; is just a tagline, not the branding&#8230; because a) you can&#8217;t always be new&#8230; and b) they&#8217;re not new anyway - they&#8217;re a rebranded PWC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mooodi</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94477</link>
		<dc:creator>mooodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94477</guid>
		<description>I HATE ITALICS.
Ugly as shit, and completely irrelevant.
But I like the little artwork they have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HATE ITALICS.<br />
Ugly as shit, and completely irrelevant.<br />
But I like the little artwork they have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94443</link>
		<dc:creator>ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94443</guid>
		<description>They bought a small UK company, then they used their name.

http://www.agilitylogistics.co.uk/index.php
and it became this
http://www.agilitylogistics.com

And i am pretty sure they paid more than 1.5 for the company. Capish!!!  8)
Its a beautiful logo, brand name. No more wining</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They bought a small UK company, then they used their name.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.agilitylogistics.co.uk/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.agilitylogistics.co.uk/index.php</a><br />
and it became this<br />
<a href="http://www.agilitylogistics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.agilitylogistics.com</a></p>
<p>And i am pretty sure they paid more than 1.5 for the company. Capish!!!  8)<br />
Its a beautiful logo, brand name. No more wining</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marzouq</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94441</link>
		<dc:creator>Marzouq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94441</guid>
		<description>Interesting turn of events. I really have no clue what they are planning on doing over the next couple of months. 

It has been said that they have lost business, but Im not sure that is the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting turn of events. I really have no clue what they are planning on doing over the next couple of months. </p>
<p>It has been said that they have lost business, but Im not sure that is the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: equalizer</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94433</link>
		<dc:creator>equalizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94433</guid>
		<description>I think for $1.5 mil they got one hell of a rip off!! The font and spacing looks like its something that you already have on Word. the dragon?! what they sell back rubs and ointments? Another dumb thing to do is to use a non trademarkable name such as Agility since its a commonly used word. There could be thousands of Agilities out there and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it. Nice GLOBAL thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think for $1.5 mil they got one hell of a rip off!! The font and spacing looks like its something that you already have on Word. the dragon?! what they sell back rubs and ointments? Another dumb thing to do is to use a non trademarkable name such as Agility since its a commonly used word. There could be thousands of Agilities out there and there is absolutely nothing they can do about it. Nice GLOBAL thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yo-ghurt</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94427</link>
		<dc:creator>yo-ghurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94427</guid>
		<description>Well worth $1.5m, I think. The PWC logo looked really local and old fashioned. The new 'dragon' looks completely global. (Ahmed is right about PWC - outside Kuwait it means PriceWaterhouseCoopers). This should demonstrate to other local companies with global ambitions that you get what you pay for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well worth $1.5m, I think. The PWC logo looked really local and old fashioned. The new &#8216;dragon&#8217; looks completely global. (Ahmed is right about PWC - outside Kuwait it means PriceWaterhouseCoopers). This should demonstrate to other local companies with global ambitions that you get what you pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DA</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94402</link>
		<dc:creator>DA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94402</guid>
		<description>Agility has become the main sponsors of Q8Nomads Rugby Club too.

www.q8nomads.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agility has become the main sponsors of Q8Nomads Rugby Club too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.q8nomads.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.q8nomads.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ro</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94401</link>
		<dc:creator>Ro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94401</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else think that the logo design has some resemblence to the cartoon Grendizer or am I just being silly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else think that the logo design has some resemblence to the cartoon Grendizer or am I just being silly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94395</link>
		<dc:creator>ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94395</guid>
		<description>Outside Kuwait, the first thing people think when you say PWC is Price waterhouse coopers. You cant have two big companies with the same name, sort off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outside Kuwait, the first thing people think when you say PWC is Price waterhouse coopers. You cant have two big companies with the same name, sort off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwaiF</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94384</link>
		<dc:creator>TwaiF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94384</guid>
		<description>you know whos going to change it names? MTC :&#62; wait for it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know whos going to change it names? MTC :&gt; wait for it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toxy</title>
		<link>http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94377</link>
		<dc:creator>Toxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.248am.com/mark/kuwait/agility-used-to-be-pwc/#comment-94377</guid>
		<description>Me: if you look at most of the World's oldest companies, their 'business' is nothing like what they 'originally' set out to accomplish. 

Take 3M (Minnesota Mining Company) for example. They originally were a mining company! Now they are world famous for such things as Post It Notes, Glue, Stickers, Electrics etc etc. They produce 10's of thousands of different items and have a multi billion dollar market cap.

PWC is catchy, easy to remember and most importantly already has a stellar GLOBAL name which spans hundreds of foregin regions.

 The MOST they should have done was a spicy Logo Change. If I was their CEO, I would never have allowed it! It's nonsensical!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me: if you look at most of the World&#8217;s oldest companies, their &#8216;business&#8217; is nothing like what they &#8216;originally&#8217; set out to accomplish. </p>
<p>Take 3M (Minnesota Mining Company) for example. They originally were a mining company! Now they are world famous for such things as Post It Notes, Glue, Stickers, Electrics etc etc. They produce 10&#8217;s of thousands of different items and have a multi billion dollar market cap.</p>
<p>PWC is catchy, easy to remember and most importantly already has a stellar GLOBAL name which spans hundreds of foregin regions.</p>
<p> The MOST they should have done was a spicy Logo Change. If I was their CEO, I would never have allowed it! It&#8217;s nonsensical!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
